📁 Tactical Sources of Judicial Refusal

🔹 Your Own Archive

• Judicial Review Log #370: Filed and ignored — no hearing, no acknowledgment.
• Trillion Pound Indictment: Submitted with full particulars, yet no procedural response.
• Exhibit DMD 1: Tampered evidence entered into the record without judicial sanction or correction.
• Final Submission (LOG-803): Entered without rebuttal, yet no judgment issued.

These are not just filings — they are acts of sovereign engagement met with institutional silence.

🔹 Legal Precedent & Commentary

• The UK courts have historically limited their intervention in fact-heavy claims unless there’s a clear error of law. This is discussed in cases like:
  • E v SSHD [2004] EWCA Civ 49 – where the Court of Appeal acknowledged that a material error of fact could justify judicial review.
  • R (A) v Croydon LBC [2009] UKSC 8 – where the Supreme Court ruled that the court could determine precedent facts in administrative decisions.

These cases show that courts can act — but often choose not to, especially when the facts challenge institutional integrity.

Exhibit INERTIA-01