Form PPI - The Private Prosecution Indictment

PRIVATE PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION 6(1) OF THE PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES ACT 1985

COURT: Magistrates' Court – London (preferably Westminster or Highbury Corner)

PROSECUTOR: WASEEM MALIK : OFFICE of the MAN:

DEFENDANT: Police Constable Harriet Lacey (P4867)

STATION: Maidenhead Police Station, Thames Valley Police

🧾 1. Nature of the Alleged Offences

The Defendant, while acting under colour of police powers, did commit the following criminal offences:

Charge	Offence	Statute / Common Law
1	Misfeasance in Public Office	Common Law
2	Contempt of Court	Common Law / N600
3	Forgery of Legal Instrument	Forgery Act 1913, s.6
4	Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm	Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s.47
5	Obstruction of Justice	Common Law
6	Criminal Breach of Data Protection	Data Protection Act 2018, s.170
7	Abuse of Powers under PACE	PACE 1984, s.22 & s.19
8	Torture / Degrading Treatment	Human Rights Act 1998, Article 3
9	Unlawful Arrest & Detention	HRA 1998, Article 5; PACE s.24
10	Trespass and Threats of Violence	Criminal Law Act 1977, s.6

📘 2. Summary of the Case

This prosecution arises from a sequence of unlawful acts committed by PC Harriet Lacey in the course of a campaign of retaliation, deception, and defiance of court authority:

Log #25: PC Lacey initiated an unprovoked arrest and seizure of medical devices, with no warrant or lawful basis.
Log #293: She knowingly relied on a forged, unsigned judicial order to impose bail restrictions.
**Logs #489–#495**: She defied a High Court order compelling return of seized property, an act of clear contempt.
**Logs #268 & #371**: Evidence indicates her actions were retaliatory in nature, not investigative.
**Logs #484 & #491**: The refusal to comply with judicial directions was institutional, deliberate, and acknowledged in writing.

This private prosecution is brought in good faith, supported by 600+ indexed evidentiary logs, NHS-confirmed medical harm, and direct violation of binding court orders.

⚖️ 3. Statutory Authority to Prosecute

This prosecution is filed under the lawful right afforded to me as a private individual by:

Section 6(1) Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
Supported by R (Gujra) v CPS [2012] UKSC 52

I affirm that I am not prohibited by any provision under s.6(2), and that the CPS has been given notice in accordance with the Gujra ruling. No intervention or discontinuance has occurred.