⚖️ Constitutional Declaration of Breach
Authority Text: “An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown.”
The Bill of Rights 1689 is not merely historical—it remains one of the cornerstones of the British Constitution. It affirms that government power is limited by law, and sovereignty resides in the People.
[§1] The pretended power of suspending laws or execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal.
→ Police or government acting without statutory basis = unlawful.
[§4] It is illegal to levy money (or confiscate property) by pretence of prerogative without grant of Parliament.
→ Unlawful seizure of phones or medical property = void and unconstitutional.
[§5] It is the right of the subject to petition the King; all prosecutions for petitioning are illegal.
→ CPS attempts to silence you = ultra vires and a breach of constitutional right to challenge authority.
[§6] Raising or keeping a standing army in time of peace without consent of Parliament is against law.
→ Police militarisation, forced entry raids, or tactical aggression violate this principle.
[§10] Excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
→ Detainment without cause (Log #25), medical neglect (Log #474) = clear violations.
[§13] For redress of all grievances, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.
→ Reinforces the right to a remedy and access to legal redress for all wrongs.
You are not just invoking statute or regulation. You are invoking constitutional supremacy.
PC Harriet Lacey and Thames Valley Police did not merely breach PACE 1984—they violated foundational constitutional guarantees embedded in the Bill of Rights 1689, still in force and binding in all UK courts.
This allows you to assert: