(With Log Reference Citations: The Archive Enters the Court)

Overview

Over a period exceeding two years, the Applicant has been subjected to a demonstrable pattern of state abandonment, administrative misconduct, and procedural manipulation. Each event, taken alone, could be dismissed as error. Taken together, they establish an institutional pattern that no court of record can ignore.

This chronology is drawn from contemporaneous records, logged and preserved within the Phoenix Bull Archive (Log Nos. #001 – #1035+). The following key events form the basis of this Judicial Review.

A. Initial Complaints and Police Inaction (2023 – Early 2024)

• Neighbour Harassment Ignored — TVP repeatedly failed to investigate violent, targeted harassment by neighbours (Log #30, #42, #126).
• Refusal to Protect — Despite photographic, audio and witness evidence, reports were closed without action (Logs #134, #150).
• Emergence of Pattern — Each request for assistance was met with inaction, followed by escalation against the Applicant.

B. Seizure & Retention of Property (2024 – 2025)

• Unlawful Seizure — TVP removed the Applicant’s property, including phones and medical devices, without warrant or lawful grounds (Log #98, #159).
• Court Intervention — On 30 June 2025, a lawful court order mandated the return of property (Exhibit 2).
• Contempt by Silence — TVP refused compliance and falsely claimed non-service (Log #318, #354).

C. Judicial Breakdown — The “Pleroma Event” (21 July 2025)

• Order Erased — The Magistrates’ Court improperly set aside its own executed order using Pleroma, a case concerning jurisdictional error — not administrative oversight.
• Clerical Pretext — The court claimed an email address typo justified cancelling the order, retroactively erasing public body contempt (Logs #422, #433).

D. Coercive Safeguarding & Institutional Harassment (12 September 2025)