Claimant: :Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris
Defendant: PC Harriet Lacey – Thames Valley Police
Venue: County Court / High Court (TBC)
Cause of Action: Misfeasance in Public Office
Filing Status: Draft for Pre-Action Protocol (pending endorsement)

🔍 Factual Background

The Defendant, PC Harriet Lacey, is accused of:

1. Unlawfully seizing the Claimant’s medical devices — critical therapeutic property removed without warrant, process justification, or judicial oversight.
2. Defying a Sealed High Court Protection Order (Exhibit J) — PC Lacey continued physical engagement with the Claimant despite being formally restrained from doing so.
3. Participating in coordinated harm alongside housing agents — acting in tandem with Abri representatives to escalate harassment, deny medical support, and undermine judicial standing.

⚠️ Allegations of Misfeasance

The Claimant asserts that:

• The Defendant’s actions were carried out in full knowledge of a live High Court Order, constituting Contempt of Court.
• PC Lacey recklessly endangered the Claimant’s medical safety and emotional wellbeing by seizing necessary treatment tools.
• The misconduct formed part of a broader campaign of targeted intimidation, in breach of Natural Justice and protective legislation.
• As a sworn public officer, the Defendant committed Misfeasance in Public Office through malicious abuse of enforcement capacity.

📎 Supporting Evidence

📜 Legal Foundations

• Contempt of Court Act 1981 – s.6
• Misfeasance in Public Office (Common Law): Requires (1) unlawful act by public officer, (2) foreseeability of harm, (3) resulting damage
• Human Rights Act 1998 – s.6: Breach of rights under:
  • Article 3 – Inhuman or degrading treatment
  • Article 8 – Right to private life, medical integrity

⚔️ Remedy Sought

• Judicial declaration of Misfeasance and Contempt