Filed By: :Waseem: Malik. β Living Man, Sui Juris
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
HOS Case Ref: 202507697 / 202508769
Date of Filing: 18 July 2025
Trigger Document: Conditional Consent Email from Abri (Exhibit G)
This doctrine asserts that the harm suffered by the claimant is not the result of isolated negligence, but a coordinated campaign of institutional retaliation.
The partnership between Abri Housing and Thames Valley Police, activated under Abriβs βstandard practice,β weaponized law enforcement against a vulnerable tenant.
The agent of execution, PC Harriet Lacey, seized medical devices in violation of a sealed High Court order β transforming procedural misconduct into targeted persecution.
Institution | Action | Motive Inferred |
---|---|---|
Abri Housing | Threatened to close hate crime case unless claimant complied | Avoid accountability by outsourcing retaliation |
Thames Valley Police | Seized phones, ignored High Court order | Enforce silence, suppress jurisdictional challenge |
PC Harriet Lacey | Acted as enforcement arm of Abri | Targeted harm via medical deprivation |
MP & Courts | Dismissed complaints, labeled victim βvexatiousβ | Institutional silencing of minority voice |
Exhibit / Log | Contents |
---|---|
Exhibit G | Abriβs threat to close hate crime case |
Exhibit J | Sealed High Court Order β return of property |
Exhibit AA / AB | Charges filed against PC Lacey |
Exhibit W | Fraud Upon the Court Dossier |
Log #560 | Notice of Liability to PC Lacey |
Log #600 | Systemic Racism Doctrine β motive codified |
Exhibit AF | Racial motive as foundational harm theory |
π Suggested File Name:
Exhibit_AE_CoordinatedHarmDoctrine_Malik_2025-07-18.pdf
π CE-File Label:
Foundational Theory β Coordinated Harm / Institutional Motive
π¬ CE-File Comment:
βThis exhibit codifies the Coordinated Harm Doctrine, establishing motive, partnership, and execution between Abri Housing and Thames Valley Police. It reframes the case from negligence to targeted institutional persecution.β