Extremely Resist and Violent Systemic Misconduct & Institutional Failure Dossier/p
📑 MASTER SUMMARY DOCUMENT
Executive Summary
This case evidences a coordinated pattern of institutional defiance, collusion, and neglect by Thames Valley Police (TVP) and Abri Group Ltd, with direct and medically documented impact on health, safety, and fundamental rights.
Core Allegations
- Judicial Defiance – TVP has failed to comply with a clear court order to return essential medical devices, instead advancing post‑hoc procedural objections never raised at the hearing they did not attend.
- Institutional Collusion – Repeated joint actions by TVP and Abri, including unannounced combined visits and coordinated communications, demonstrate a shared strategy to suppress complaints rather than resolve them.
- Racial Harassment – Abri has been put on notice of racist hate incidents with corroborating witness evidence, yet has sought to trivialise the matter and limit its historic scope, contrary to Ombudsman guidance on ongoing harassment.
- Health Endangerment – GP records and contemporaneous logs link seizures of medical devices and ongoing harassment to severe psychological distress, physical symptoms, and disruption of diabetes management, engaging Articles 3 and 8 ECHR thresholds for inhuman or degrading treatment and interference with private life.
Key Legal Fronts
- High Court contempt proceedings (N600) targeting TVP’s continuing non‑compliance with the property‑return order.
- Judicial Review AC‑2025‑LON‑001909 challenging TVP’s lawfulness and procedural conduct.
- Private Prosecution (Malik v Lacey) seeking criminal accountability for seizure and retention of property, contempt, and related misconduct.
- Housing Ombudsman “severe maladministration” complaint against Abri for failure to respond adequately to racist harassment and ASB.
Institutional Obstruction Playbook