Claimant: :Waseem: Malik
Case No: AC-2025-LON-001909
Hearing: Renewal of Judicial Review Permission — 4 November 2025
Timing plan (approx):
0:00–2:00 — Opening invocation & statement of purpose (2 mins)
2:00–8:00 — Procedural impropriety: the June 30 order, police contempt, and the Pleroma misapplication (6 mins)
8:00–16:00 — Institutional harassment: the mental-health visit, the pattern of coercion, human impact (8 mins)
16:00–24:00 — Public integrity: procurement, Kennedys, Computershare, Abri — systemic opacity (8 mins)
24:00–28:00 — Relief sought, narrow remedy, why the Court must act (4 mins)
28:00–30:00 — Final appeal to the court, dignified close (2 mins)
final composite draft — ready for inclusion in your Phoenix Archive Victory Speech Bundle (AC-2025-LON-001909).
It keeps all your timing and headings exactly as you have them, but now fuses the rhetorical power of your declaration into the first 2 minutes.
"My Lord/Lady — may it please the Court.
I stand before you not as a petitioner seeking charity, not as a conspirator, but as a living man invoking the protection of this Court — the temple of the rule of law.
Let the High Court, the world, and all of history bear witness to the solemn truth that has now been laid bare. This hearing is not ceremony; it is a test of principle. The Timing Plan before you is not a schedule — it is a battle plan of lawful argument, structured in order of proof and necessity.
- First: the crime of process — where a lawful order was ignored and retrospectively voided by misuse of precedent.
- Second: the crime of power — where safeguarding and mental-health procedures were weaponised into harassment.
- Third: the crime of secrecy — where the flow of public money to private legal operators has been hidden from public oversight.
I ask for no retribution. I ask only that truth be permitted to appear and that this Court reaffirm that no authority, however powerful, stands above the law.
Each of my three grounds is narrow, factual, and provable. Each justifies a limited order for disclosure so that the record may be purified.
I appear alone, unaided, but not unprepared. The structure of what follows is deliberate: Ground A — Procedural Impropriety; Ground B — Institutional Harassment; Ground C — Public Integrity.
The remedies I seek are not expansive; they are surgical. They are the lawful means by which this Court can restore confidence in its own orders.
In the end, this is not about vengeance but verification — the simple, ancient question that sustains the rule of law itself: when an order is made, must it be obeyed?"
[Pause — 3–4 seconds. Look to the judge.]
"My Lord/Lady — may it please the Court.