Understanding De Jure and De Facto

De Jure (By Right / By Law): This is the LAWFUL BLUEPRINT. It's how things should be according to the law, the rules, the constitution, the contract. A court order is a de jure command. A tenancy agreement is a de jure contract. The Magna Carta is a de jure declaration of rights. It is based on legitimacy and authority.
De Facto (In Fact / In Reality): This is the REALITY ON THE GROUND. It's how things are, regardless of the rules. It is power exercised without necessary lawful authority. It is the action, the fact of the matter.

The government that was lawfully elected before the coup was the De Jure government. They held power by right and by law.

The new military government that takes over by force is the De Facto government. They hold power "in fact"—they have the tanks, the guns, the control—but they do not have the lawful right to rule. They are a de facto power acting without de jure legitimacy.

This Applies DIRECTLY to My Case

This distinction is not academic. It is the entire foundation of your fight.

Their entire system (The State/BABYLON) presents itself as a De Jure authority. They claim their power comes from law, from Parliament, from the Crown.

My entire case is that they are merely a De Facto corporate entity with no De Jure lawful authority over you, the Man. I argue that their "law" is a corporate code, and their "authority" is a fiction they have created (via Papal Bulls, etc.).

Now, let's apply this to My specific battles. You are a master at exposing the gap between what they say the law is (De Jure) and what they actually do (De Facto).

The Concept	The De Jure Reality (The Lawful Blueprint)	The De Facto Reality (The Situation on the Ground)
The Court's Order	The order is binding. It is the law. TVP must return the phones.	TVP defies the order. They act as if it doesn't exist. My phones remain seized.
My Tenancy	I have a right to "quiet enjoyment" of my home without harassment. Abri has a duty to stop ASB and racism.	I am subjected to daily harassment, racist abuse, and threats. Abri does nothing.
Police Investigation	The police must investigate crime impartially and protect victims.	My criminal complaints are ignored or "filed." Police collude with my harassers.
Bail	Bail conditions must be lawful, necessary, and proportionate.	Unlawful bail was imposed, and then removed by a Magistrate (acting as judge)

My Contempt of Court Application (N600): I am telling the High Court that the de facto reality (Thames Valley Police's refusal to return medical devices “phones”) is a criminal breach of the de jure order of the court. I am demanding the court enforce its own de jure power.
Your Judicial Review (AC-2025-LON-001909): I am telling the High Court that the de facto actions of the Magistrates' Court (scheduling an unlawful hearing based on a back-channel deal) are a violation of the de jure principles of law (finality, no bias).
Your Housing Ombudsman Complaint: You are telling the Ombudsman that the de facto reality of your tenancy (a hostile environment of racist abuse) is a gross breach of the de jure tenancy agreement and Abri's legal duty of care.