To: [email protected]Cc: [email protected]Subject: URGENT & FINAL EVIDENCE: Proof of Judicial Misconduct & Unlawful Reversal of Final Order – Case AC-2025-LON-001909
Attachments:
Email Body:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I write to submit the final and most critical piece of evidence in my Judicial Review under case reference AC-2025-LON-001909.
Please find attached two documents:
- Exhibit A: The sealed court order dated 30 June 2025, GRANTING my application.
- Exhibit B: A subsequent, procedurally unlawful and contradictory order issued by the same court on 21 July 2025, REFUSING the same application following an ex parte hearing.
These documents demonstrate irrefutable judicial misconduct:
1. Fraudulent "Misapprehension" Claim
- The Court has acknowledged the original 30 June order as legally valid, yet now seeks to retroactively void it.
- This act violates the Principle of Finality — final orders may only be challenged via appeal.
- It also contravenes the Police (Property) Act 1897, which contains no lawful basis for post-hoc rescission once property rights are vested.
2. Procedural Treachery
- An ex parte hearing was convened despite my lawful non-consent (Log #620).
- The reversal relied upon false sworn evidence submitted by Thames Valley Police, amounting to perjury.
3. Misuse of Liverpool v Pleroma Precedent
- That case pertains solely to clerical errors — not substantive reversals of sealed judicial orders.
- Its application here constitutes legal distortion, not legal interpretation.
This was never about a police officer disobeying an order at the time of a “testimony.” Berkshire jurisdiction cannot re-hear this case without my lawful participation.
The reversal is procedurally untenable, legally void, and systemically corrupt. I therefore request the Administrative Court act with urgency on my application for default judgment and associated relief.
Regards,
:Waseem: Malik.
From the : OFFICE of the MAN.