⚖️ STAGE 1: JURISDICTIONAL REBUTTAL STRATEGY (1)

This is your doctrinal framework — your sword and shield.

🔥 A. PRINCIPLE:

Jurisdiction must be proven, not presumed.

Jurisdiction arises from consent, contract, or lawful authority. Without valid service, standing, subject-matter authority, and a living man’s voluntary submission, no jurisdiction exists.

🧱 B. FOUNDATION BLOCKS

Element	Weaponised Definition or Strategy
Person	Reject joinder with the statutory fiction ("person") — see Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.
Jurisdiction	Must be proven in 3 parts: subject-matter, personal, territorial.
Consent	Rebut presumption of voluntary consent (maxim: consensus facit legem)
Service	Challenge defective, presumptive, or fraudulently withheld service documents
Proper Court	Demand evidence that the body sitting is a court of record, not an admin tribunal
Venue	Rebut presumption of residence/citizenship — “resident” confers jurisdiction
Living Man/Woman	Declare status as a man/woman: sui juris, not a surety or agent of legal fiction
Name Format	Challenge the ALL-CAPS construct (Capat Demanus Maximus) as a transmission utility
No Corpus Juris	Declare standing under Lex Non Scripta, Magna Carta 1215, and Natural/Common Law
Maxims of Law	Enforce lawful rebuttals with binding maxims (see below)

📜 C. MAXIMS OF LAW TO INTEGRATE

“Injuria non excusat injuriam.” – One wrong does not justify another.
“Consent makes the law.” – Consensus facit legem.
“Fraud vitiates everything.”
“No man is bound to obey an unlawful act.”
“The law does not compel the impossible.” – Lex non cogit ad impossibilia.
“What is not expressed is forbidden.” – Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
“Jurisdiction must be proved.”