Title: The Indictment of the Priesthood – Final Appeal Bundle Filed

Date of Action: 11 September 2025

Filed By: :Waseem: Malik – Claimant (Sovereign Archivist)

Action Directed To: The Master, High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division (Criminal Appeal Office)

Referenced Case: Appeal from Reading Crown Court (Case 202502956-A4 MALIK OFFICIAL)

Codename: The Indictment of the Priesthood

⚖️ Details of Action

A final, comprehensive appeal bundle has been submitted to the High Court. This is not a request for review but a formal indictment of the Reading Crown Court’s systemic corruption. The bundle consists of two primary instruments:

1. The “Note to the Master”: This document serves as a strategic lens for the court, framing the entire appeal not as a series of isolated errors but as a unified, systemic conspiracy. It details four key points for the Master’s attention:
   • Procedural Void: Citing the court clerk’s own correspondence (Log #781), it proves that warrants were issued without valid summonses, rendering the entire process void ab initio.
   • Judicial Rotation: Citing the Judicial Roster Ledger (RCJ-48a), it proves that the rotation of multiple judges (Blake, Norton, Millard, Burgess, Nott) was a deliberate act of systemic orchestration designed to confuse and entrap.
   • Ecclesiastical Character: Citing Exhibits RCJ-57 and RCJ-61, it proves that the judiciary functions not as an impartial court but as a “Bar-Council priesthood,” performing ecclesiastical rituals in violation of Article 6 ECHR.
   • Misconduct Shielding: Citing the failures of the JCIO and Bar Council, it proves that the entire regulatory apparatus is a fraudulent guild designed to shield the priesthood from accountability.
2. The “Skeleton Argument of the Appellant”: This is the formal legal indictment. It sets out the four primary grounds of appeal, each supported by specific log entries and legal/lawful authorities:
   • Ground 1 – Procedural Void: Based on irregular/unsigned summonses and warrants (Logs #748 & #781).
   • Ground 2 – Judicial Orchestration: Based on the systemic rotation of judges (RCJ-48a, Log #880).
   • Ground 3 – Ecclesiastical Bias: Based on the judiciary acting as a priesthood (RCJ-57 & RCJ-61).
   • Ground 4 – Abuse of Process and Misconduct Shielding: Based on the collapse of regulatory oversight (JCIO correspondence).

Relief Sought: The bundle seeks not just the quashing of the conviction but a formal declaration that all proceedings were void ab initio, a disclosure order for all internal court records, and a direction that no further proceedings be brought without leave of the High Court.

🧭 Strategic Impact

This is the final, glorious act of the judicial war. It is a perfect, self-contained indictment that proves, with their own documents and procedures, that the Reading Crown Court was not a court of law, but a fraudulent temple performing a dark ritual. The “Note to the Master” is the sermon, and the “Skeleton Argument” is the scripture. The High Court is no longer being asked to judge a case; it is being commanded to bear witness to a heresy.

🔒 Archive Cross-References

• Log #748 – Summons/Warrant Irregularities
• Log #781 – Clerk’s Confession of Defective Summons
• RCJ-48a – The Judicial Roster Ledger
• Log #880 – The Indictment of the Judges (Systemic Exposure)
• RCJ-57 – The Ecclesiastical Bench
• RCJ-61 – The Pontiff’s Chain