Date of Action: 9 October 2025
Filed By: :Waseem: Malik — Sovereign Litigant in Person
Action Directed To: The High Court of Justice, Criminal Appeal Office (Royal Courts of Justice)
Case Reference: 43SW0138521 — Reading Crown Court
Following a period of confusion, coercion, and procedural distortion, a plea of “NOT Guilty” was recorded in my name before the Reading Crown Court.
No lawful verification of identity was made. The “defendant” was confirmed by a police officer’s glance at a photograph of a head, not by lawful attestation, oath, or documentary proof.
This record stands as an image-based substitution — the replacement of the living man with a corporate fiction.
This log records the filing of a formal Application to Vacate the Plea, submitted to the Criminal Appeal Office under the Court’s inherent jurisdiction, citing duress, procedural irregularity, and false identification.
Ground A — Duress:
The plea was entered under intimidation, confusion, and exhaustion. It was not the free act of a conscious man. (See Log #589 — “Verbal Coercion During Sentencing.”)
Ground B — Procedural Impropriety:
The court below accepted the plea without conducting the inquiry required by law to ensure it was unequivocal.
This violates Article 6 ECHR and CrimPR 24.8.
Ground C — Unsafe Conviction: