By fusing ecclesiastical, civil, maritime, and commercial codes into a single undifferentiated process, the Respondents operate in breach of transparency, procedural fairness, and lawful jurisdiction.

This syncretic fusion of legal systems—originating from Papal Bulls, Roman persona constructs, and Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) principles—has no valid application to the living man, Waseem: Malik.

I do not consent to be treated as a corporate fiction or “person” under Roman Civil or Admiralty jurisdiction.

I stand as a living man, under Divine Natural Law and Common Law, protected by the ancient constitutional instruments and maxims of equity.

This jurisdictional confusion is deliberately maintained:

• To deny access to lawful remedy
• To conceal the absence of due process
• To enforce presumption over consent

The concealment of the 22 July 2025 NFA letter by Custody Officer Blunden, and the continued reliance on PACE without a valid warrant, exemplify the abuse of this synthetic hybrid system.

📚 Instruments and Authorities Invoked

I rebut and collapse the presumed jurisdiction being fraudulently imposed, and hereby invoke:

• 🕊 Papal Bull Unam Sanctam (1302)
• 📜 Magna Carta 1215, Clause 39: “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned… except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.”
• 🏛 English Bill of Rights 1689
• 🧬 Human Rights Act 1998, Articles 5, 6, and 8
• 🪙 UCC 1-308 – Reservation of Rights without Prejudice

Accordingly, the arrest, detention, and seizure of property are void ab initio, executed without jurisdiction, and sustained through fraudulent legal fusion.

📜 Maxims of Law Applied