Case No.: KB-2025-003308

Claimant: :Waseem: Malik

Defendant: Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police

Purpose of Application

This Part 8 claim is not about damages or contested fact. It is a request for the Court’s declaratory recognition of documentary responses already received from regulators and state bodies (the RCJ-46 Series).

Basis in CPR

• CPR 8.1(2): Part 8 is appropriate where the Claimant seeks the Court’s decision on a legal question unlikely to involve substantial dispute of fact.
• CPR 8.2(1): The claim form properly identifies the question: whether the RCJ-46 Series forms part of the procedural record and carries legal significance.
• Authority: Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 387 confirms that declaratory relief itself constitutes a recognised cause of action.

Nature of Relief Sought

The Claimant seeks only:

1. A declaration that the RCJ-46 Series stands as part of the record in these proceedings.
2. Directions for further management.

Why the Court’s Recognition Matters

• The documents are undisputed and originate from official bodies (SRA, BSB, BoE, TVP).
• They evidence a systemic absence of regulatory jurisdiction over the Claimant.
• Recognition is required to ensure the Court record is complete and accurate.

Tone & Conduct

This is not a collateral attack or speculative action. It is a narrow procedural step, framed respectfully, to safeguard the integrity of the proceedings.

Filed by: