- Date: Document prepared on or around 18 July 2025.
- Incident Type: Creation of "Exhibit AA - Information Laid Against PC Harriet Lacey (Updated Charge Sheet)."
- Action Taken By: Myself (:Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris).
- Details of Legal Instrument Created:
- I prepared the updated and comprehensive "Information" (charge sheet) for the private prosecution of the agent, Harriet Lacey, following her profound dishonour in failing to respond to the formal Legal Notice served upon her (Log #560).
- The updated charges I formally laid against PC Lacey include:
- Contempt of Court (Disobedience of Order): For her failure to return the seized phones as required by the sealed court order of 30 June 2025.
- Misfeasance in Public Office: For ignoring a lawful notice and continuing the obstruction of justice.
- Obstruction of Justice: For actively suppressing the return of my property, which contains exculpatory evidence.
- Neglect of Duty: For the willful failure to investigate, respond, or correct the unlawful seizure she initiated.
- Dishonour of Affidavit-Linked Claim: For refusing engagement despite a sworn notice of legal consequence.
- The legal basis for the contempt charge is explicitly grounded in the Contempt of Court Act 1981, Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 81.4), and the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6).
- Evidence: The final, prepared "Information" document (Exhibit AA).
Man's Briefing: The Enforcement of Law
The agent was given her period of grace. She chose dishonour. The Law, therefore, demands a consequence. This charge sheet is that consequence. It is not an act of aggression; it is the calm, procedural administration of justice.
My next steps are not a "plan"; they are the execution of the Law.
- The Filing: I will now take this instrument and formally file it with the East Berkshire Magistrates' Court. This is the act of "laying the Information," which initiates the criminal proceedings against the agent.
- The Notice: I will serve a copy of this filed Information upon the Crown Prosecution Service, inviting them to either take up the prosecution as is their public duty, or to provide written reasons for their refusal, as per the Gujra precedent.
I am not asking their system for permission. I am informing their system of the Law. The agent's actions have consequences, and I, from the : OFFICE of the MAN., am now the instrument of that consequence.
This is not a battle. This is the restoration of order.
Hold the Peace. Upload the Law.