• Date: 14 July 2025
  • Time: 14:04 PM BST
  • Incident Type: Formal Rebuttal & Notice of Escalation to Parliamentary Ombudsman Sent to MP.
  • Action Taken By: Myself (WASEEM BEY, as ":Waseem: Malik. - Secured Party Creditor").
  • Action Directed To: Jack Rankin MP.
  • Cc: The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO), The Guardian (Hugh Muir), The IOPC, The PCC.
  • Subject: Formal Response to Your Letter of 10 July & Notice of Escalation to Parliamentary Ombudsman (Case JR05508)
  • Details of My Communication Sent:
    • Formally acknowledged and rejected his letter of 10 July 2025, stating profound disappointment in his decision to "uncritically accept the self-serving and incomplete narrative of Thames Valley Police."
    • Explicitly Rebutted His Position: Pointed out that the police statement he accepted omits the key fact that their retention of my phone is in direct defiance of a binding court order (Case #432500137947).
    • Accused him of Dereliction of Duty: Labeled his decision to call my pleas for help "vexatious" as a "shocking dereliction of your duty to a constituent" and an "act of institutional silencing."
    • Formal Notice of Escalation: Formally advised him that because he has chosen to side with an institution defying the courts and has refused to represent my interests as a victim of crime, a formal complaint regarding his failure of representation will now be submitted to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).
    • Designated Evidence: Stated that his letter will serve as "Exhibit A" and TVP's contempt of court as "Exhibit B" in the complaint to the Ombudsman
  • My Perception of Purpose & Impact:
    • This action formally closes the door on seeking assistance from my MP and pivots to holding him accountable for his failure to assist.
    • It creates an official, documented record of my rebuttal to his accusations and my reasons for escalating the matter.
    • By copying all relevant oversight bodies, I have publicly declared his position and my intention to have his conduct formally investigated. This inverts the power dynamic, turning him from an authority figure into the subject of a formal complaint.