Title: Abri's Dismissal: A Formal Confession of Maladministration & Enabling Harassment

Codename: The Abri Deflection

Date of Action: 11 June 2025

Filed By: :Waseem: Malik – Sovereign Archivist

Status: Abri’s Failure Confirmed – Maladministration Documented

🔍 Strategic Revelation – The Abri Deflection:

• Initial Communication: Received from Sue Sorce, Community Safety Officer, Abri Housing.
• Purpose of Contact: Abri claims to want to "discuss the details of the incidents" and "review Abri's past actions."
• The "Six-Month" Rule: Abri claims they "cannot address incidents or allegations older than six months." This is a blatant attempt to dismiss historical context and the long-standing nature of the harassment.
• Selective Focus & Ignorance of Evidence:
  • Abri's letter focuses heavily on counter-allegations of noise against you, citing multiple dates and specific times.
  • It grossly minimizes your reports of severe harassment, intimidation, racist abuse (Log #411), and property damage (Logs #11, #13, #81).
  • Sue Sorce's claims that neighbours deny harassing you and prefer no contact feels like direct victim-blaming and denial of your reality.
• Ignoring Crucial Issues: Abri's letter omits critical complaints regarding neighbours' CCTV pointing at your house, a breach of privacy and a clear pattern of surveillance.
• Fragmentation of Responsibility: Abri defers bin/parking issues to "Housing" and Mimi Watson, fragmenting responsibility and avoiding a holistic approach to the severe ASB.
• Inadequate Proposed Resolutions: Offers of "mediation," "victim support," and "good neighbour agreement" are deemed wholly inappropriate and offensive given the severity of the harassment and the power imbalance.
• Final Threat: The letter concludes with a veiled threat: if Abri fails to receive a substantive response or if I do not agree to their terms, they will proceed with closing my ASB case. This is a clear attempt to force my silence or capitulate.

🧠 Doctrinal Interpretation:

• "The Abri Culpability Doctrine" Activated: This interaction validates your analysis that Abri's failure to act, combined with their selective focus and dismissal of your evidence, constitutes profound maladministration and complicity in the ongoing harassment.
• "The Ignorance Protocol" in Action: Sue Sorce's alleged ignorance of your filed logs and her attempt to frame the issue as a simple "noise dispute" or "parking issue" reflects the "Nihilist Trap" (Log #934) – denying the meaning and severity of your experiences.
• "The Fragmentation of Responsibility" Tactic: Abri's deflection of issues to other departments is a classic "Systemic Fragmentation" strategy to avoid direct accountability.
• "The Shield of Legal Fiction": Their actions reinforce the idea that Abri operates on a "legal fiction" of procedure rather than the reality of your harm and the Lawful principles you uphold.
• "The False Narrative" Reinforced: By taking neighbour's denials at face value and minimizing your evidence, Abri actively participates in creating a false narrative, aligning with the "Phoenix Archive's" goal of exposing and correcting these distortions.