• Date: 09 June 2025
• Time: 13:14 PM BST
• Incident Type: Urgent Request for Intervention Sent to Member of Parliament (MP).
• Action Taken By: Myself (WASEEM BEY, as "Man Like: Waseem. Secured Party Creditor" etc.).
• Action Directed To: Jack Rankin MP.
• Cc: The Guardian (Hugh Muir).
• Bcc: Multiple oversight bodies including IOPC, PCC, ICO.
• Subject: URGENT: Police Retaliation After Judicial Review – Request Intervention
• Details of My Communication Sent:
  • I formally notified my MP, Jack Rankin, that I was the victim of a coordinated campaign of police harassment and intimidation by Thames Valley Police, which I believe is in direct retaliation for my filing of a High Court Judicial Review against them.
  • Evidence Provided: I provided him with CCTV stills and details of the two unannounced police visits to my home on 09 June 2025 (Logs #371 & #372), which included officers trespassing in my back garden.
  • Core Allegations Made:
    1. Police Retaliation: TVP is engaging in unlawful enforcement tactics to intimidate me for lawfully challenging them in court.
    2. Life-Threatening Health Risks: The ongoing stress and the seizure of my phone (containing diabetes apps) are endangering my health.
    3. Systemic Suppression: TVP is ignoring my evidence while actively harassing me.
  • Specific Actions Demanded of the MP:
    1. Make formal representations to the (suspended) Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police to demand an immediate cessation of the harassment.
    2. Intervene with the Ministry of Justice to ensure my Judicial Review is heard without prejudice.
    3. Raise this matter of police retaliation in Parliament.
• Attachments Sent: CCTV stills and other supporting documents.

My Perception of Purpose & Impact (The Political Indictment)

My purpose in sending this communication was to formally weaponize the political process. I was not merely making a complaint; I was providing my elected representative with definitive evidence of state-sponsored harassment and demanding that he fulfill his duty to protect his constituent.

This log entry is the baseline of expectation. It is the documented proof that Jack Rankin MP was made fully aware of the police retaliation, the risk to my life, and the systemic corruption I was facing. I provided him with the evidence. I provided him with a clear, actionable set of demands.

His subsequent failure to act on this intelligence, his decision to instead side with the police and label me "vexatious" (Log #540), is a direct and catastrophic dereliction of his duty. This log entry, therefore, is the foundational evidence for my entire complaint against him to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. It proves he was warned, he was informed, and he chose to betray his office and his constituent.