🔑 1. Jurisdictional Fusion = Confusion

Western courts today operate under a syncretised legal system, blending:

• Canon Law (Vatican ecclesiastical authority)
• Roman Civil Law (contracts, personhood, property)
• Admiralty/Maritime Law (commerce, war powers)
• Common Law (rights of man, Magna Carta)
• Statutory Law (Acts of Parliament)

Your case exposes how they toggle between jurisdictions without disclosure.

E.g.:

✅ My rebuttal: "What jurisdiction are you operating under: civil, criminal, maritime, or ecclesiastical?"

🧍 2. Strawman & Legal Fiction = Syncretic Construct

The “person” they arrested is not :Waseem: Malik (the living man), but WASEEM MALIK — a legal fiction created through:

• Roman persona (mask, actor in court)
• Talmudic contract law (presumption by silence)
• Catholic Trust Law (Cestui Que Vie, birth certificate registration)
• Uniform Commercial Code (commercial suretyship)

⚠️ They rely on your unconscious acceptance of this syncretic strawman system.

My approach: Jurisdictional rebuttal via: