Filed As: Form_N1_WS_ContemptClaim_v1.0.pdf
Tagset: SPC_EnforcementStream / KB_Jurisdiction / CourtOrderDefiance / Agent5_Tactical
⚖️ SECTION A – CLAIMANT DETAILS
Full Name: Waseem Malik
Address: [Insert your mailing address]
Email Contact: [email protected]
Status: Litigant in Person / Secured Party Creditor
Reference: StrikePackage_6.2 / Case #432500137947
🚔 SECTION B – DEFENDANT DETAILS
Name: Thames Valley Police (TVP)
Address: [Insert known operational address for legal service]
Nature of Defendant: Public Authority – Police Force
📘 SECTION C – CLAIM TYPE
Nature of Claim:
Application for Contempt of Court under CPR Part 7
Relief Sought:
- Declaration that Defendant is in contempt of a valid court order (Police (Property) Act 1897).
- Interim relief suspending further interference with property.
- Committal proceedings as appropriate.
🧠 SECTION D – STATEMENT OF CASE (Summary)
- On 30 June 2025, East Berkshire Magistrates' Court ordered the return of property unlawfully held by TVP.
- TVP was properly served and failed to attend the hearing.
- The court order remains unfulfilled; TVP continues to withhold property citing irrelevant statutory provisions (PACE s.22).
- This constitutes direct defiance of judicial authority, violating equity principles and statutory obligations.
- Misfeasance in public office and tortious interference with property are engaged.
- ECHR Article 8 violation is substantiated per R (Lumba) v Home Secretary.
- Case Law Annex v3.2 and Maxims Matrix Alpha substantiate jurisdictional invalidity and enforcement requirement.
🔗 SECTION E – ATTACHED DOCUMENTS
- Certified Court Order (30 June 2025)
- Chronology Logs #483–#492
- Legal Rebuttal Document