Filed By: :Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris
Date of Filing: 20 July 2025
Venue: High Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions (CPS)

⚖️ Legal Weapon Deployed: R (Gujra) v DPP [2012] UKSC 52

Para 71 – Public Interest Test Failing:“…the decision must be made with the utmost rigour…subject to challenge in judicial review.”

Para 72 – Justification Mandate:“…Courts must be given intelligible reasons to justify discontinuance. Silence or unreasoned refusal is unlawful.”

📌 Applied Context:
CPS refusal to engage with private prosecution (Exhibit AA) lacks both rigour and intelligible justification.
Claimant has filed charges under Contempt of Court Act, Misfeasance, and Obstruction — all documented, sworn, and unrebutted. CPS silence constitutes actionable dishonour.

💣 Ultimatum Clause

🧨 Trap Activated: Any CPS attempt to dismiss or ignore the application without express reasoning activates Gujra-based judicial review under Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909.

📎 Evidence Anchors Filed

• Exhibit AA – Private Prosecution Charge Sheet
• Exhibit J – Sealed High Court Protection Order
• Exhibit AG – Affidavit of Historical Torture
• Exhibit AE – Coordinated Harm Doctrine
• Log #589 – Notice of Jurisdictional Defect
• Log #610 – Final Pre-Action Briefing & Tactical Protocol

📂 Suggested File Name:

Exhibit_H_GujraIndictment_CPS_Malik_2025-07-20.pdf

📎 **CE-File Label:**Gujra Application / CPS Obstruction / Judicial Review Weaponization

💬 CE-File Comment: