Filed By: :Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris
Core Complaint Ref: 556213
HOS Case Ref: 202507697
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
ECHR Relevance: Violation of Articles 3, 6, and 8

🔹 Executive Summary – Theory of Coordinated Harm

This document codifies the central doctrine of the claimant’s legal challenge: that Abri Group Limited, upon failing to address targeted harassment by neighbours, shifted its corporate responsibility by engaging Thames Valley Police as a retaliatory enforcement arm.

This strategic deflection not only compounded the harm — it weaponized law enforcement against a vulnerable individual already suffering under institutional neglect.

The culmination of this abuse was executed by PC Harriet Lacey, who unlawfully seized the claimant's medical devices (phones), contravening a sealed High Court protection order, and acting in defiance of procedural law and basic human rights.

This was not negligence. It was persecution.

🔗 Evidentiary Anchors

⚖️ Legal Framework Invoked

• R v Dytham [1979] QB 722 – Misfeasance in Public Office
• Gujra v DPP [2012] UKSC 52 – CPS refusal triggers direct accountability
• ECHR Article 3 – Protection from inhuman and degrading treatment
• ECHR Article 6 – Right to fair hearing and equal protection
• ECHR Article 8 – Right to private life and freedom from state interference

📝 Declaratory Relief Sought

• Formal finding of Severe Maladministration (HOS)
• Emergency activation of Rule 39 interim protections (ECHR)
• Suspension of all lower court proceedings under jurisdictional breach
• Public inquiry into collusion between housing and policing functions