📘 Location: support_docs / ECHR_Bundle / Section_II_CourtOrders
Filename Format Suggestion:
📎 Exhibit_II_Contradiction_Sequence_PropertyAct1897.pdf
This will preserve integrity across platforms and help keep Strasbourg submissions fully synchronized. You can also cross-link this inside your Notion dashboard under:
🔗 StrikePackage_Index / Judicial Contradiction Node / Article6_A1P1_Breach
| Ref | Title | Date | Log | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| II.1 | Certified Court Order – Return of Property | 30 June 2025 | Log #396 | Ordered return of 3 devices. TVP failed to attend. Judgment in applicant’s favour. |
| II.2 | Conflicting Court Order – Refusal of Return | 21 July 2025 | Log #489 | Denied same request under different case number. No rationale. Contradicts prior order. |
“These two orders contradict one another. On 30 June 2025, a court certified and ordered that Thames Valley Police must return all items to the applicant under s1 of the Police (Property) Act 1897. On 21 July 2025, without legal basis or new contest from TVP, a second order denied the exact same claim under a separate case reference. This suggests either administrative manipulation or judicial inconsistency, both of which breach Article 6 (fair trial) and Article 1 Protocol 1 (right to peaceful enjoyment of property).”