WHAT THE COURT ORDERS SHOW:

Order 1: 30 June 2025 (Case No. 432500137947)

Court: East Berkshire Magistrates' Court

Judge: Julien Vanytghem - Head Of Legal Operations (South East), Justices' Clerk

Date: 30 June 2025

Order:

"It is ordered that Order made under s1 Police Property Act 1897 for the return of the following items to Waseem Malik – 1x Apple iPhone Pro Max (Approximate Value £1062.00 IMEI: 356415755869534), 1x Apple iPhone 5S (Approximate Value £50) and 1x Samsung 20 Ultra (Approximate Value £300) to be returned to Waseem Malik of 2 Vaughan Gardens, Eton Wick, Berkshire, SL4 6JT

Reason: The Applicant attended but, despite being notified on 06 June 2025, Thames Valley Police did not attend to contest the application."

Status:VALID COURT ORDER


Order 2: 21 July 2025 (Case No. 432500161562/2)

Court: East Berkshire Magistrates' Court

Judge: Julien Vanytghem - Head Of Legal Operations (South East), Justices' Clerk

Date: 21 July 2025

Order:

"Application for an order in respect of property, namely 1. An Apple iPhone Pro Max (approx value £1062.00 IMEI: 356415755869534) 2. An Apple iPhone 5S (approx value £50) 3. A Samsung 20 Ultra (approx value £300), which has come into the possession of the police. In accordance with section 1 of the Police (Property) Act 1897.

Application refused."

Status: ⚠️ SECOND APPLICATION – REFUSED (does NOT explicitly "set aside" the 30 June order)


CRITICAL LEGAL ANALYSIS:

What Drewe Got WRONG: