Part A – Case Details

• Court: [Insert Higher Court Name]
• Appellant: [Your Name or Entity]
• Respondent: [Court or Enforcement Authority]
• Appeal Reference: [To be assigned]

Part B – Grounds for Appeal

1. Procedural Error:
   • "Where the law is defective, remedy lies in procedure."
   • Contradictory orders under same statute without reconciled reasoning violate R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28: courts must be procedurally coherent in quasi-judicial acts.
2. Misapplication of Precedent:
   • R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21: governmental or judicial override must justify departure from established legal protection.
   • “An order which contradicts a former without revocation is void in equity.”
3. Violation of Article 6 ECHR – Right to Fair Hearing:
   • Disregard of prior ruling undermines legal certainty, triggering Kudla v Poland [2000] ECHR 512: procedural fairness extends to consistency and transparency.
4. No Reasoned Judgment:
   • English v Emery Reimbold [2002] EWCA Civ 605: orders must include sufficient reasoning — its absence renders decisions open to reversal.

Part C – Supporting Bundle Contents

💬 Legal Maxims for Annex Inclusion

• “The law respects form less than substance.”
• “Equity abhors a forfeiture.”
• “He who comes to equity must come with clean hands.”
• “A right once vested cannot be divested arbitrarily.”
• “Once jurisdiction is lost, everything thereafter is void.”