Anchor Logs: #748, #781 (Reading Crown Court events), RCJ-51 (Temple of Procedure), RCJ-57 (Ecclesiastical Bench), RCJ-61 (The Pontiff’s Chain).

1. Judicial Function = Ecclesiastical Ritual
   • The High Court must not ignore that English judicial architecture derives directly from Papal supremacy.
   • Unam Sanctam (1302) declared every human subject to the Pontiff. Courts carry forward this presumption via ritual: robes, altars (benches), congregations (public gallery).
   • Judges are not independent — they are consecrated actors of a guild descended from this priesthood.
2. Warrants, Summons, and Orders = Bulls
   • Just as Papal Bulls reshaped nations by fiat, court orders are treated as divine writ, unchallengeable, despite procedural voids.
   • In this appeal, the “warrant backed for bail” and “non-existent summons” (log #781, Michael Matthews email) operate exactly like Bulls: assertions of power without lawful grounding.
3. JCIO and Bar Council = Vatican Curia
   • Misconduct complaints disappear into closed chambers, exactly as Vatican heresy trials did.
   • Discipline is internal, never public — the priesthood shields itself.
4. Strategic Claim to High Court
   • This appeal demonstrates not only judicial error but ritual choreography of an ecclesiastical system.
   • The Phoenix Archive logs (RCJ-51, RCJ-57, RCJ-61) prove systemic bias: the bench acts as clergy, not as independent arbiters.
   • The appeal seeks nullification under Article 6 ECHR – Right to a Fair Trial, as a court functioning as church-ritual cannot provide impartial adjudication.