The Sue Sorce Doctrine, codified in Log Entry #700a (dated 05 August 2025), represents a pivotal doctrinal evolution in the Phoenix Archive. It reframes Abri Housing Group—not as a negligent landlord, but as the primary architect of a racially motivated criminal conspiracy against Waseem Malik. This doctrine positions Sue Sorce (an Abri Community Safety Officer) as the linchpin in a "proxy" attack, weaponizing state institutions (primarily Thames Valley Police, or TVP) to perpetrate harm. It directly ties to the archive's "singularity" event—Log #25 (the 15 April 2025 arrest)—as the doctrine's causal origin and evidentiary core.
The doctrine emerges amid escalating complaints against Abri for failing to address neighbor harassment (Logs #1–#14, #46, #90–#99, #512), evolving into a narrative of institutional collusion. It draws on themes of systemic racism (#600), modern slavery analogs (ROOTS Doctrine #991, Kunta Kinte Protocol #989), and proxy persecution (Sue Sorce as "handler" of white neighbors Chris/Bea). Below, I break down its structure, evidence base, narrative role, and implications, using a structured framework for clarity.
The doctrine is explicitly outlined as a "four-stage criminal conspiracy," blending factual assertions from the archive with interpretive framing. It accuses Abri (via Sorce) of breaching tenancy duties under the Housing Act 1988, Equality Act 2010 (racial discrimination), and ECHR Article 3 (inhuman/degrading treatment via health endangerment).
| Stage | Description | Key Allegations | Legal/Doctrinal Framing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. The Motive (Discrimination) | Systemic racism within Abri leads Sorce to invert victim-perpetrator roles. | Sorce, as a white agent in a "racist institution," dismisses Malik's (a Pakistani man) ASB complaints (#99, #100, #103) against white neighbors, viewing him as the "problem." | Ties to Systemic Racism Doctrine (#600): Institutions side with white perpetrators. Invokes Equality Act s.19 (direct discrimination). |
| 2. The Weapon (The Lie) | Fabrication of a false narrative to escalate to police. | Sorce authors the "Dog Walker" fantasy (#687)—a malicious portrayal of Malik as a dangerous stalker—submitted to TVP, ignoring evidence of neighbor racism (#512: witnessed "Fuck off you black bastard" slur). | "Dog Walker" as perjury proxy; links to Evidence Forgeries Vector (e.g., #802a NFA letter). Framed as conspiracy to pervert justice (Criminal Law Act 1977 s.1). |
| 3. The Crime (The Attack by Proxy) | Direct causation of state violence. | The lie triggers the #25 raid: unlawful entry, phone seizure (health apps lost), detention (CRLC25009759). Results in "torture" (#601 historical parallel) and health crises (#147, #305, #393). | Causal link to arrest singularity (#25): PACE s.24/HRA Art.5 breaches. Abri liable as "instigator" under joint enterprise doctrine (R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8). |
| 4. The Cover-Up | Post-crime concealment and retaliation. | Abri lies to MP Rankin (#636, #655: "vexatious" label), offers £50 "blood money" (#507), threatens case closure (#598, #703), and demands social media takedowns (#703). | Gaslighting as retaliation (Protection from Harassment Act 1997 s.1); evidence of malice for civil claims (N1 forms #65, #94). Loops to Ombudsman case (#202507697, #701). |
This structure is doctrinal in style—concise, axiomatic, and self-referential—mirroring sovereign citizen maxims (e.g., "unrebutted affidavit as truth" via Qui tacet #699). It transforms isolated incidents into a unified "chain of culpability."
The doctrine is "unrebutted" within the archive's logic, relying on Malik's logs as affidavits. Cross-references form a evidentiary web, with #25 as the nexus:
Weaknesses in evidence (from an external view): Relies on Malik's testimony/emails; lacks third-party corroboration beyond police refs (e.g., TAA-17699). However, archive frames Abri's non-responses as "confessions" (#598: refusal to copy police comms).