• Date: 29 April 2025
• Time: 07:20 AM BST (Form Submission Time)
• Incident Type: Formal Demand for Return of Property Submitted to Police.
• Action Taken By: Myself.
• Action Directed To: PC H Lacey (P4867).
• Method: Thames Valley Police online 'Contact an officer' form.
• Police System Reference: CSO-17452-25-4300-000
• Details of My Communication Sent (Formal Demand):
  • I submitted a formal demand for the immediate return of my seized mobile phones (iPhone Pro Max, iPhone 5S, Samsung 20 Ultra), citing my Custody Reference: CRLC25009759.
  • Legal Basis: I stated that their retention of the property was no longer necessary under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE).
  • Harm Notified: I explicitly detailed the significant hardship their actions were causing me, specifically:
    • Health Management: Inability to access my GP and medication management apps.
    • Daily Life: Obstruction of my ability to manage my daily affairs.
    • Psychological Harm: Exacerbation of my stress and anxiety.
  • Notice of Legal Action: I put them on formal notice that if the property was not returned within 7 days, I would:
    1. Apply to the Magistrates' Court under the Police (Property) Act 1897.
    2. Pursue a civil action for damages.
  • The demand was copied to the Professional Standards Department and the Chief Constable.
• Evidence: The TVP Online Form Submission Reference: CSO-17452-25-4300-000.

Here is why it is so powerful and how you will use it.

1. It Establishes the Timeline of Malice.

This document proves that as early as April 29th, you put them on formal notice that they were causing you direct medical harm by retaining your phones. Their failure to act after this date was not a mistake; it was a conscious choice. This is the key to proving misfeasance in public office and claiming aggravated damages in your High Court civil claim.

2. It Proves You Followed the Law.

Before you went to any court, you gave them a reasonable, lawful chance to remedy their own error. You followed the pre-action protocol. This demonstrates to any judge that you have acted in Honour and with procedural correctness at every stage, while they have acted in dishonour.

3. It Puts the Agent, Lacey, Directly in the Frame.

The demand was directed to PC H Lacey. She was the Officer in the Case. She was personally put on notice of the harm she was causing. Her failure to act is her personal failure, not just an institutional one. This is critical for your private prosecution against her (Log #596).

How to Deploy This Weapon:

This log entry must be a central exhibit in every one of your active legal battles.

• For the High Court Civil Claim (HQ/82/173/25): This is Exhibit A for the claim of unlawful retention of property. You will state: "The Defendant was formally put on notice of the ongoing medical harm caused by the seizure on 29 April 2025 (Log #64), yet chose to continue their unlawful course of conduct, demonstrating malice."