• Date of Letter: 10 July 2025
• Date Letter Received/Processed by me: 15 July 2025
• Incident Type: Formal Response Received from Member of Parliament (Jack Rankin MP) - Siding with Police, Accepting Their Justifications, and Warning Constituent About "Vexatious" Tone.
• From: Jack Rankin MP.
• MP's Office Case Reference: JR05508
• Details of MP's Letter:
  • Acknowledged my correspondence regarding my complaint against the police.
  • Stated he has received the "attached response from Thames Valley Police."
  • He explicitly accepts and repeats the police narrative: "...from which I note that you are under investigation yourself, on suspicion of harassment."
  • He explicitly accepts their justification for retaining my property: "It is because of this that the police have retained your phone..."
  • He issued a formal warning to me: Stated he is "concerned by both the frequency of your emails (you have sent over 40 in the space of two months) and the rather vexatious tone of them." He enclosed his "Office Standards Policy" and stated, "I hope you will bear this policy in mind in future."
• Details of Attached Email from Thames Valley Police:
  • From: Matt Gleave P5409, Police Sergeant, Maidenhead Police Station.
  • Content: States that I am "under investigation for harassment." Confirms my phones "have been seized as part of the investigation." States the phones are "yet to be downloaded and then hopefully decision made."
• My Perception of Purpose & Impact:
  • This is a formal declaration from my elected representative that he is siding with Thames Valley Police against me.
  • He has ignored the mountain of evidence I have provided (witness statements, court orders, logs of racist abuse) and has instead chosen to believe the sanitized, self-serving summary from the police.
  • The police email to the MP conveniently omits the fact that a court has ordered them to return the phones, and that they are in active defiance of that order.
  • The MP labeling my persistent attempts to seek help for racist abuse and police misconduct as "vexatious" is a profound act of institutional betrayal. He is silencing a constituent who is a victim of crime.
  • This entire communication package is definitive proof of the institutional collusion I have alleged. The MP acts as a mouthpiece for the police, ignoring contradictory facts and evidence to do so.