• Date: 06 July 2025
  • Time: 08:51 AM BST
  • Incident Type: Formal Contempt of Court Bundle Submitted to High Court (King's Bench Contempt Office).
  • Action Taken By: Myself (Waseem Malik, as "Litigant in Person / Private Prosecutor").
  • Action Directed To: King's Bench Contempt Office ([email protected]).
  • Bcc: [email protected].
  • Referenced Case: Magistrates' Court Case #432500137947.
  • Subject: URGENT: CONTEMPT – TVP DEFYING COURT ORDER [Case #432500137947]
  • Details of My Communication and Submission:
    • Notified the King's Bench Contempt Office of a "serious and ongoing contempt of court" by Thames Valley Police (TVP).
    • Stated TVP is refusing to comply with a lawful order issued by East Berkshire Magistrates' Court on 30 June 2025 under the Police (Property) Act 1897 for the return of my three mobile phones.
    • Highlighted that TVP failed to attend the hearing, and have since refused to comply, citing irrelevant procedural objections and PACE s.22 powers, which are overridden by the court's order.
    • Stated I have filed Form N600 and am now submitting a bundle for the court's urgent attention.
    • Bundle Contents Listed:
      • Annex A – Chronology of Events (Logs #483–#492).
      • Certified Court Order (of 30 June 2025).
      • Form N600 – Contempt Application.
      • Legal Rebuttal (likely your email from Log #492).
      • Supporting exhibits (FOI refusal, CPS notification, health impact).
      • Bundle Index (Contempt Bundle).
    • Asserted TVP's conduct constitutes "deliberate defiance of judicial authority and misfeasance in public office."
    • Formally requested the court to:
      • List this matter for urgent consideration.
      • Issue a committal order or interim relief as appropriate.
    • PS Addendum: Added that "TVP's conduct amounts to tortious interference with property + Article 8 ECHR violation per R (Lumba) v Home Secretary*."
  • Attachments Sent with Email (9 attachments listed):
    • Exhibit J.1 - Certified Court Order (30 June 2025).png
    • FOI Refusal Letter #485.pdf (Note: #485 was the Kennedys email dismissing your private prosecution. The FOI refusal was likely #457 or #460. Please verify which specific refusal letter this is).
    • Internal Review Request – FOIA Ref 01_FOI_25_015391_U.pdf (Note: The ref 01_FOI_25_015391_U doesn't match a previous log, but this appears to be one of your formal challenges to a TVP FOI response).
    • Health Crisis Log #483.docx
    • Legal Rebuttal to TVP #492.pdf
    • Private Prosecution Charge Sheet #486.docx (Note: #486 was your log of the police station refusal. The charge sheet was #479. Please verify).
    • N600_1024.pdf (Your completed N600 form).
    • Annex A – Chronology of Events.docx
    • UPDATED - Private Prosecution charge sheet Haressment [sic] PC H Lacey.pdf
  • My Perception of Purpose & Impact:
    • My purpose is to formally lodge my application for contempt of court against Thames Valley Police with the appropriate High Court office (King's Bench Contempt Office).
    • By submitting a comprehensive and indexed evidence bundle, I am providing the court with all the necessary information to urgently consider my application.
    • I am demonstrating the seriousness of TVP's defiance, linking it to misfeasance in public office and human rights violations, and seeking urgent judicial intervention in the form of a committal order or other relief.
    • This action significantly escalates the consequences for TVP's non-compliance with the Magistrates' Court order.
  • Context/Link to Other Events: This is the formal submission to the High Court of the Contempt of Court application (N600) detailed in Log #488. It is a direct response to TVP's refusal to return my property on July 2nd (Log #484/#486) in defiance of the June 30th court order (Log #489).
  • Evidence: Saved copy of the sent email and all nine listed attachments.